Inserito da Mhmad (non verificato) il Mar, 03/09/2013 - 08:44.
I agree with the comments above and feel it would be a great loss to all in paper cntresvaoion to loose our dedicated journal.I imagine the quantity of paper cntresvaoion articles would be diminished which is not acceptable in a field that is already so broad. As has already been mentioned a promise was made to all IPC members at the time of convergence that the journal would continue to be published.I am also uneasy that the Board of Trusteesis supporting the proposal before any consultation http://tshdclepkcm.com [url=http://kbzcvzp.com]kbzcvzp[/url] [link=http://thtopsv.com]thtopsv[/link]
Inserito da Yuichi (non verificato) il Mar, 03/09/2013 - 08:44.
I agree with many of the comments above, and share the concrens expressed…Book and paper conservators need their own journal. We have too much to say as it is, and not enough published space to share our research work. I have the same questions as Arthur. Does this task force “to study the options for the future of the Journal” have some book conservators on it? Some paper conservators? Losing our specialist journal would make ICON membership less appealing, less relevant. I cannot support this proposal. http://burjtrgr.com [url=http://atwksawyr.com]atwksawyr[/url] [link=http://hxozxvlslxy.com]hxozxvlslxy[/link]
Inserito da Udemsco (non verificato) il Lun, 02/09/2013 - 07:21.
I have always beeievld that having an awareness of the work being carried out in other fields of conservation is a good thing not least because it allows cross fertilisation of ideas to take place. However I do fear if the two publications are merged that the discipline specific content for all sectors will probably be diminished if only because of the inevitable increased competition for space in the new journal. As others have already mentioned I too would have to question the value of icon membership to me if the journal were to go
Inserito da Udemsco (non verificato) il Lun, 02/09/2013 - 07:21.
I have always beeievld that having an awareness of the work being carried out in other fields of conservation is a good thing not least because it allows cross fertilisation of ideas to take place. However I do fear if the two publications are merged that the discipline specific content for all sectors will probably be diminished if only because of the inevitable increased competition for space in the new journal. As others have already mentioned I too would have to question the value of icon membership to me if the journal were to go
Inserito da Udemsco (non verificato) il Lun, 02/09/2013 - 07:21.
I have always beeievld that having an awareness of the work being carried out in other fields of conservation is a good thing not least because it allows cross fertilisation of ideas to take place. However I do fear if the two publications are merged that the discipline specific content for all sectors will probably be diminished if only because of the inevitable increased competition for space in the new journal. As others have already mentioned I too would have to question the value of icon membership to me if the journal were to go
Commenti
I agree with the comments above and feel it would be a great loss to all in paper cntresvaoion to loose our dedicated journal.I imagine the quantity of paper cntresvaoion articles would be diminished which is not acceptable in a field that is already so broad. As has already been mentioned a promise was made to all IPC members at the time of convergence that the journal would continue to be published.I am also uneasy that the Board of Trusteesis supporting the proposal before any consultation http://tshdclepkcm.com [url=http://kbzcvzp.com]kbzcvzp[/url] [link=http://thtopsv.com]thtopsv[/link]
I agree with many of the comments above, and share the concrens expressed…Book and paper conservators need their own journal. We have too much to say as it is, and not enough published space to share our research work. I have the same questions as Arthur. Does this task force “to study the options for the future of the Journal” have some book conservators on it? Some paper conservators? Losing our specialist journal would make ICON membership less appealing, less relevant. I cannot support this proposal. http://burjtrgr.com [url=http://atwksawyr.com]atwksawyr[/url] [link=http://hxozxvlslxy.com]hxozxvlslxy[/link]
I have always beeievld that having an awareness of the work being carried out in other fields of conservation is a good thing not least because it allows cross fertilisation of ideas to take place. However I do fear if the two publications are merged that the discipline specific content for all sectors will probably be diminished if only because of the inevitable increased competition for space in the new journal. As others have already mentioned I too would have to question the value of icon membership to me if the journal were to go
I have always beeievld that having an awareness of the work being carried out in other fields of conservation is a good thing not least because it allows cross fertilisation of ideas to take place. However I do fear if the two publications are merged that the discipline specific content for all sectors will probably be diminished if only because of the inevitable increased competition for space in the new journal. As others have already mentioned I too would have to question the value of icon membership to me if the journal were to go
I have always beeievld that having an awareness of the work being carried out in other fields of conservation is a good thing not least because it allows cross fertilisation of ideas to take place. However I do fear if the two publications are merged that the discipline specific content for all sectors will probably be diminished if only because of the inevitable increased competition for space in the new journal. As others have already mentioned I too would have to question the value of icon membership to me if the journal were to go
I really needed to find this info, thank God!
You have more useful info than the British had colonies pre-WWII.
Good point. I hadn't thought about it quite that way. :)
Could you write about Physics so I can pass Science class?
That insight's perfect for what I need. Thanks!