Inserito da Lorena (non verificato) il Sab, 10/08/2013 - 11:46.
Thanks for your comments. All of the maratiel that I have collected to date has been obtained legally and is in the public domain in one of the following ways:(a)Judgements, court transcripts, subpoenaed maratiel tendered into court evidence;(b)Statements that I have personally collected;(c)Material that has been provided to me by third parties, including audio and video maratiel. These maratiels were created by the people who provided them without committing any offence, though the data itself may record the commission of an offence or offences;(d)Material that is otherwise in the public domain e.g. newspaper articles, Youtube, academic publications;(e)Third party maratiel, which I am still attempting to verify and has, in and of itself, been obtained legally. Material that I cannot verify through independent secondary sources is not published on Blak and Black.The primary purpose of the maratiels I’ve collected is to eventually form the basis of a submission to the United Nations Human Rights Committee. It would not be helpful to my submission to include information that was sourced illegally. Whilst I appreciate that there is a role for organizations such as Wikileaks, that is not a path that I intend to tread.It would be inappropriate to have or view maratiels that were sourced improperly from a police service or government agency. If victims of police corruption wish to add their stories to those I have already collected, I would be more than happy to meet with them. However, I would be looking for primary source maratiel that was legally obtained and independently verifiable.
Inserito da Lorena (non verificato) il Sab, 10/08/2013 - 11:46.
Thanks for your comments. All of the maratiel that I have collected to date has been obtained legally and is in the public domain in one of the following ways:(a)Judgements, court transcripts, subpoenaed maratiel tendered into court evidence;(b)Statements that I have personally collected;(c)Material that has been provided to me by third parties, including audio and video maratiel. These maratiels were created by the people who provided them without committing any offence, though the data itself may record the commission of an offence or offences;(d)Material that is otherwise in the public domain e.g. newspaper articles, Youtube, academic publications;(e)Third party maratiel, which I am still attempting to verify and has, in and of itself, been obtained legally. Material that I cannot verify through independent secondary sources is not published on Blak and Black.The primary purpose of the maratiels I’ve collected is to eventually form the basis of a submission to the United Nations Human Rights Committee. It would not be helpful to my submission to include information that was sourced illegally. Whilst I appreciate that there is a role for organizations such as Wikileaks, that is not a path that I intend to tread.It would be inappropriate to have or view maratiels that were sourced improperly from a police service or government agency. If victims of police corruption wish to add their stories to those I have already collected, I would be more than happy to meet with them. However, I would be looking for primary source maratiel that was legally obtained and independently verifiable.
Inserito da Lorena (non verificato) il Sab, 10/08/2013 - 11:46.
Thanks for your comments. All of the maratiel that I have collected to date has been obtained legally and is in the public domain in one of the following ways:(a)Judgements, court transcripts, subpoenaed maratiel tendered into court evidence;(b)Statements that I have personally collected;(c)Material that has been provided to me by third parties, including audio and video maratiel. These maratiels were created by the people who provided them without committing any offence, though the data itself may record the commission of an offence or offences;(d)Material that is otherwise in the public domain e.g. newspaper articles, Youtube, academic publications;(e)Third party maratiel, which I am still attempting to verify and has, in and of itself, been obtained legally. Material that I cannot verify through independent secondary sources is not published on Blak and Black.The primary purpose of the maratiels I’ve collected is to eventually form the basis of a submission to the United Nations Human Rights Committee. It would not be helpful to my submission to include information that was sourced illegally. Whilst I appreciate that there is a role for organizations such as Wikileaks, that is not a path that I intend to tread.It would be inappropriate to have or view maratiels that were sourced improperly from a police service or government agency. If victims of police corruption wish to add their stories to those I have already collected, I would be more than happy to meet with them. However, I would be looking for primary source maratiel that was legally obtained and independently verifiable.
Inserito da Tariq (non verificato) il Ven, 09/08/2013 - 01:44.
Well what can I say ABSOLUTELY AMAZING!!! Our wedding pierctus really are brilliant. Dave has done a fantastic job in capturing every moment throughout our day looking through our pics for the first time reduced me to tears of joy, re-living our special day! I cannot thank you enough. Choosing a photographer for your wedding day is probably one of the hardest decisions, choose Dave Allen as your wedding photographer and you will not regret it, I promise. Thanks again, Lana and Chris Read x
Commenti
Thanks for your comments. All of the maratiel that I have collected to date has been obtained legally and is in the public domain in one of the following ways:(a)Judgements, court transcripts, subpoenaed maratiel tendered into court evidence;(b)Statements that I have personally collected;(c)Material that has been provided to me by third parties, including audio and video maratiel. These maratiels were created by the people who provided them without committing any offence, though the data itself may record the commission of an offence or offences;(d)Material that is otherwise in the public domain e.g. newspaper articles, Youtube, academic publications;(e)Third party maratiel, which I am still attempting to verify and has, in and of itself, been obtained legally. Material that I cannot verify through independent secondary sources is not published on Blak and Black.The primary purpose of the maratiels I’ve collected is to eventually form the basis of a submission to the United Nations Human Rights Committee. It would not be helpful to my submission to include information that was sourced illegally. Whilst I appreciate that there is a role for organizations such as Wikileaks, that is not a path that I intend to tread.It would be inappropriate to have or view maratiels that were sourced improperly from a police service or government agency. If victims of police corruption wish to add their stories to those I have already collected, I would be more than happy to meet with them. However, I would be looking for primary source maratiel that was legally obtained and independently verifiable.
Thanks for your comments. All of the maratiel that I have collected to date has been obtained legally and is in the public domain in one of the following ways:(a)Judgements, court transcripts, subpoenaed maratiel tendered into court evidence;(b)Statements that I have personally collected;(c)Material that has been provided to me by third parties, including audio and video maratiel. These maratiels were created by the people who provided them without committing any offence, though the data itself may record the commission of an offence or offences;(d)Material that is otherwise in the public domain e.g. newspaper articles, Youtube, academic publications;(e)Third party maratiel, which I am still attempting to verify and has, in and of itself, been obtained legally. Material that I cannot verify through independent secondary sources is not published on Blak and Black.The primary purpose of the maratiels I’ve collected is to eventually form the basis of a submission to the United Nations Human Rights Committee. It would not be helpful to my submission to include information that was sourced illegally. Whilst I appreciate that there is a role for organizations such as Wikileaks, that is not a path that I intend to tread.It would be inappropriate to have or view maratiels that were sourced improperly from a police service or government agency. If victims of police corruption wish to add their stories to those I have already collected, I would be more than happy to meet with them. However, I would be looking for primary source maratiel that was legally obtained and independently verifiable.
Thanks for your comments. All of the maratiel that I have collected to date has been obtained legally and is in the public domain in one of the following ways:(a)Judgements, court transcripts, subpoenaed maratiel tendered into court evidence;(b)Statements that I have personally collected;(c)Material that has been provided to me by third parties, including audio and video maratiel. These maratiels were created by the people who provided them without committing any offence, though the data itself may record the commission of an offence or offences;(d)Material that is otherwise in the public domain e.g. newspaper articles, Youtube, academic publications;(e)Third party maratiel, which I am still attempting to verify and has, in and of itself, been obtained legally. Material that I cannot verify through independent secondary sources is not published on Blak and Black.The primary purpose of the maratiels I’ve collected is to eventually form the basis of a submission to the United Nations Human Rights Committee. It would not be helpful to my submission to include information that was sourced illegally. Whilst I appreciate that there is a role for organizations such as Wikileaks, that is not a path that I intend to tread.It would be inappropriate to have or view maratiels that were sourced improperly from a police service or government agency. If victims of police corruption wish to add their stories to those I have already collected, I would be more than happy to meet with them. However, I would be looking for primary source maratiel that was legally obtained and independently verifiable.
Well what can I say ABSOLUTELY AMAZING!!! Our wedding pierctus really are brilliant. Dave has done a fantastic job in capturing every moment throughout our day looking through our pics for the first time reduced me to tears of joy, re-living our special day! I cannot thank you enough. Choosing a photographer for your wedding day is probably one of the hardest decisions, choose Dave Allen as your wedding photographer and you will not regret it, I promise. Thanks again, Lana and Chris Read x